- android.gs
- Compare
- 600 vs Reno15 Pro 5G
Honor 600 vs OPPO Reno15 Pro 5G
What 600 does better (7) and where Reno15 Pro 5G wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Display8.4
9.0Camera9.0
9.3Battery9.0
9.8Features9.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
600Reno15 Pro 5G
| 600 | Reno15 Pro 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 156 mm | 151 mm | +5 mm |
| Width | 74.7 mm | 72 mm | +2.7 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 187 g | −2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 600 better than Reno15 Pro 5G?
- Peak brightness8,000 nits vs 1,800 nits4.4×
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 6,200 mAh+13%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.3″+4%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6+17%
- Resolution (width)1,264 px vs 1,216 px+4%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8 mm+2%
Why is Reno15 Pro 5G better than 600?
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 512 GB4×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx9+12%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio91.2% vs 93.3%+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 187 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 156 mm | 151 mm |
| Width | 74.7 mm | 72 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP69 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx9 |
| Glass protection | — | Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Golden White, Black, Orange | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.3″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,264 px | 1,216 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,728 px | 2,640 px |
| Pixel density | 458 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 8,000 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,749 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.2% | 93.3% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7750-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 | Mediatek Dimensity 8450 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Mediatek |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.8 GHz | — |
| GPU | Adreno 722 | — |
| AnTuTu score | 1,087,148 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 4,090 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,797 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | — |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.4" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 6,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | — |
| Active use (test) | 17 h | — |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 71% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.1 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (ultrasound), compass | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 10 | ColorOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | 6 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | A |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,600 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 67 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
