- android.gs
- Compare
- 50 vs Zero X Pro
Honor 50 vs Infinix Zero X Pro
What 50 does better (14) and where Zero X Pro wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.3Display7.5
5.2Performance3.0
7.6Camera9.7
4.9Battery4.9
7.9Features2.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
50Zero X Pro
| 50 | Zero X Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160 mm | 164.1 mm | −4.1 mm |
| Width | 73.8 mm | 75.7 mm | −1.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.8 mm | = |
| Weight | 175 g | 193 g | −18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 50 better than Zero X Pro?
- AnTuTu score470,348 vs 313,652+50%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,971 vs 1,674+77%
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- NFCYes · Zero X Pro: No
- Wired charging66 W vs 45 W+47%
- Measured brightness748 nits vs 515 nits+45%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.05 GHz+17%
- Weight175 g vs 193 g+10%
- Peak brightness750 nits vs 700 nits+7%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 4+50%
Why is Zero X Pro better than 50?
- Optical stabilisationNo · 50: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · 50: Yes
- Battery capacity4,300 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+5%
- Memory card slotNo · 50: Yes
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · 50: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · 50: Yes
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 175 g | 193 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 160 mm | 164.1 mm |
| Width | 73.8 mm | 75.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Colours | Frost Crystal, Amber Red, Emerald Green, Midnight Black, Honor Code | Nebula Black, Starry Silver, Tuscany Brown |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 392 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 750 nits | 700 nits |
| Measured brightness | 748 nits | 515 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 86.5% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.05 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 470,348 | 313,652 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,971 | 1,674 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.52" | 1/1.52" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 5× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,300 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 105% | 80% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.2 LUFS | -28.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 7.1 | XOS 10 |
