- android.gs
- Compare
- 400 Smart vs RugKing 3 Pro
Honor 400 Smart vs UleFone RugKing 3 Pro
What 400 Smart does better (14) and where RugKing 3 Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.9Display5.2
4.1Camera3.9
8.3Battery5.7
6.8Features6.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
400 SmartRugKing 3 Pro
| 400 Smart | RugKing 3 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.9 mm | 173.8 mm | −6.9 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 83 mm | −6.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 12.9 mm | −4.5 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 286 g | −97 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 400 Smart better than RugKing 3 Pro?
- Wired charging35 W vs 10 W3.5×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- 5GYes · RugKing 3 Pro: No
- Stereo speakersYes · RugKing 3 Pro: No
- Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 5,700 mAh+14%
- Weight189 g vs 286 g+51%
- Peak brightness700 nits vs 500 nits+40%
- Main camera50 MP vs 48 MP+4%
- CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 1.8 GHz+28%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · RugKing 3 Pro: No
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+3%
Why is RugKing 3 Pro better than 400 Smart?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Memory card slotNo · 400 Smart: Yes
- Pixel density261 ppi vs 269 ppi+3%
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 8 MP+60%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 286 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 12.9 mm |
| Height | 166.9 mm | 173.8 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 83 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Scratch-resistant glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Black | Black, Green, Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,610 px | 1,612 px |
| Pixel density | 261 ppi | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 700 nits | 500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86% | 71.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 | Unisoc T7250 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| AnTuTu score | 591,791 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,125 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,500 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 10 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9.0 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,600 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 70 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
