How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. 400 Pro vs Reno16 Pro (China)

Honor 400 Pro vs OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)

What 400 Pro does better (4) and where Reno16 Pro (China) wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Honor 400 Pro
Honor · 2025400 Pro
9.5Score
4 advantages≈ $630
vs
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
OPPO · 2026Reno16 Pro (China)
9.6Score
9 advantages≈ $620
Higher score
9.3Display9.0
8.4Performance9.3
9.5Camera9.7
8.5Battery9.6
9.8Features9.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

400 ProReno16 Pro (China)
76.1 × 160.88.176.4 × 161.37.7
400 ProReno16 Pro (China)Difference
Height160.8 mm161.3 mm−0.5 mm
Width76.1 mm76.4 mm−0.3 mm
Thickness8.1 mm7.7 mm+0.4 mm
Weight205 g205 g=

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 400 Pro better than Reno16 Pro (China)?

  1. Wired charging100 W vs 80 W+25%
  2. Peak brightness5,000 nits vs 3,600 nits+39%
  3. eSIMYes · Reno16 Pro (China): No
  4. Pixel density460 ppi vs 450 ppi+2%

Why is Reno16 Pro (China) better than 400 Pro?

  1. AnTuTu score1,902,675 vs 3,079,298+62%
  2. Battery capacity5,300 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+32%
  3. RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
  4. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,552 vs 8,359+28%
  5. CPU frequency3 GHz vs 3.73 GHz+24%
  6. Optical zoom3× vs 3.5×+17%
  7. Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
  8. Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
  9. Thickness8.1 mm vs 7.7 mm+5%
Specifications

Side by side

Honor 400 ProHonor 400 Pro≈ $6309.5
Design
Weight205 g205 g
Thickness8.1 mm7.7 mm
Height160.8 mm161.3 mm
Width76.1 mm76.4 mm
FramePlasticAluminium
BackGlass—
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
ColoursMidnight Black, Lunar Grey, Tidal BlueBlack, Blue, White
Display
Screen size6.7″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)1,280 px1,272 px
Resolution (height)2,800 px2,772 px
Pixel density460 ppi450 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits3,600 nits
Measured brightness1,481 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio89.5%91.2%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3Mediatek Dimensity 9500s
Chip makerQualcommMediaTek
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3 GHz3.73 GHz
GPUAdreno 750Immortalis-G925 MC11
AnTuTu score1,902,6753,079,298
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,5528,359
3DMark Wild Life Extreme4,620—
Memory
RAM12 GB16 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 3.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera200 MP200 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.4"—
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3×3.5×
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP50 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity5,300 mAh7,000 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)13.9 h—
Wired charging100 W80 W
Charged in 30 min102%—
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power50 W50 W
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-23.4 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass, proximity (ultrasonic)Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceMagicOS 10ColorOS 16
Major OS updates promised6—
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,200—
Endurance per cycle56 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare