- android.gs
- Compare
- 400 Pro (China) vs S50 Pro mini
Honor 400 Pro (China) vs Vivo S50 Pro mini
What 400 Pro (China) does better (8) and where S50 Pro mini wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Display7.6
9.6Camera9.4
9.7Battery9.5
9.3Features9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
400 Pro (China)S50 Pro mini
| 400 Pro (China) | S50 Pro mini | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 156.3 mm | 150.8 mm | +5.5 mm |
| Width | 74.7 mm | 71.8 mm | +2.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 204 g | 191 g | +13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 400 Pro (China) better than S50 Pro mini?
- Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Battery capacity7,200 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+11%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.3″+4%
- Charged in 30 min80% vs 48%+67%
- Wireless charging power50 W vs 40 W+25%
- Resolution (width)1,264 px vs 1,216 px+4%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8 mm+3%
Why is S50 Pro mini better than 400 Pro (China)?
- CPU frequency3.3 GHz vs 3.8 GHz+15%
- Weight204 g vs 191 g+7%
- Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.6+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 204 g | 191 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 156.3 mm | 150.8 mm |
| Width | 74.7 mm | 71.8 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | — |
| Colours | Black, Silver, Blue, Pink | Black, Purple, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.3″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,264 px | 1,216 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,736 px | 2,640 px |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 461 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 90.2% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm SM8845 Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.3 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Adreno 829 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 2,974,201 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 9,401 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.4" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,200 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 90 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 80% | 48% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | 40 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9 | OriginOS 6 |
