android.gs
Compare
400 Pro (China) vs Find X8 Ultra

Honor 400 Pro (China) vs OPPO Find X8 Ultra

What 400 Pro (China) does better (6) and where Find X8 Ultra wins (11) — every spec side by side.

Honor · 2025400 Pro (China)

9.5Score

6 advantages≈ $450

OPPO · 2025Find X8 Ultra

9.6Score

11 advantages

Higher score

9.0Display9.1

9.6Camera9.8

9.7Battery9.4

9.3Features9.3

Dimensions

Size comparison

400 Pro (China)Find X8 Ultra

	400 Pro (China)	Find X8 Ultra	Difference
Height	156.3 mm	163.1 mm	−6.8 mm
Width	74.7 mm	76.8 mm	−2.1 mm
Thickness	7.8 mm	8.8 mm	−1 mm
Weight	204 g	226 g	−22 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 400 Pro (China) better than Find X8 Ultra?

Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
Peak brightness5,000 nits vs 2,500 nits2×
Battery capacity7,200 mAh vs 6,100 mAh+18%
Weight204 g vs 226 g+11%
Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.8 mm+13%

Why is Find X8 Ultra better than 400 Pro (China)?

Optical zoom3× vs 6×2×
Wired charging90 W vs 100 W+11%
CPU frequency3.3 GHz vs 4.32 GHz+31%
Pixel density460 ppi vs 510 ppi+11%
Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+4%
USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
Rear cameras3 vs 4+33%
Charged in 30 min80% vs 100%+25%
Resolution (width)1,264 px vs 1,440 px+14%
Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Honor 400 Pro (China)≈ $4509.5	OPPO Find X8 Ultra9.6
Design
Weight	204 g	226 g
Thickness	7.8 mm	8.8 mm
Height	156.3 mm	163.1 mm
Width	74.7 mm	76.8 mm
Frame	Aluminium	—
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Aluminosilicate glass	Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version)
Colours	Black, Silver, Blue, Pink	Matte Black, Pure White, Shell Pink
Display
Screen size	6.6″	6.8″
Panel	AMOLED	LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	—	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,264 px	1,440 px
Resolution (height)	2,736 px	3,168 px
Pixel density	460 ppi	510 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	5,000 nits	2,500 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,157 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	90.3%	90.2%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3	Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	3 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.3 GHz	4.32 GHz
GPU	Adreno 750	Adreno 830
AnTuTu score	—	2,710,432
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	9,503
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	6,644
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 4.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	200 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.4"	1"
Rear cameras	3	4
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	3×	6×
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	—	120 fps
Selfie camera	50 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	7,200 mAh	6,100 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	Si/C
Active use (test)	—	16.3 h
Wired charging	90 W	100 W
Charged in 30 min	80%	100%
Wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging power	50 W	50 W
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	2	3.2
Video output	—	Yes
Satellite messaging	—	Yes
Infrared port	—	Yes
Dual-band GPS	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-26.3 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display, ultrasonic
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	MagicOS 9	ColorOS 16