- android.gs
- Compare
- 300 Ultra vs Aquos R9
Honor 300 Ultra vs Sharp Aquos R9
What 300 Ultra does better (15) and where Aquos R9 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
300 UltraAquos R9
| 300 Ultra | Aquos R9 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.8 mm | 156 mm | +7.8 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 75 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.9 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 198 g | 195 g | +3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 300 Ultra better than Aquos R9?
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Peak brightness4,000 nits vs 2,000 nits2×
- Telephoto cameraYes · Aquos R9: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Aquos R9: No
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Battery capacity5,300 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+6%
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Aquos R9: No
- Pixel density437 ppi vs 396 ppi+10%
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+7%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.5″+4%
Why is Aquos R9 better than 300 Ultra?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 240 Hz2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx8+60%
- Memory card slotNo · 300 Ultra: Yes
- eSIMNo · 300 Ultra: Yes
- Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.9+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 198 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 163.8 mm | 156 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Giant rhino glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, White | Snow White, Forest Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | PRO IGZO LTPO OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,700 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 437 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,000 nits | 2,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.4% | 88.6% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm SM7675-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Adreno 732 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,237,843 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,702 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3.8× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,300 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | — |
| Wired charging | 100 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 118% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 80 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite messaging | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
