- android.gs
- Compare
- 300 Ultra vs Reno10 Pro+
Honor 300 Ultra vs OPPO Reno10 Pro+
What 300 Ultra does better (9) and where Reno10 Pro+ wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.3Display8.7
9.6Camera9.3
9.5Battery6.7
8.3Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
300 UltraReno10 Pro+
| 300 Ultra | Reno10 Pro+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.8 mm | 162.9 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 74 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.3 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 198 g | 194 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 300 Ultra better than Reno10 Pro+?
- Peak brightness4,000 nits vs 1,400 nits2.9×
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Wireless chargingYes · Reno10 Pro+: No
- Battery capacity5,300 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+13%
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
- Optical zoom3.8× vs 3×+27%
- 4K selfie videoYes · Reno10 Pro+: No
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6+17%
Why is Reno10 Pro+ better than 300 Ultra?
- Pixel density437 ppi vs 451 ppi+3%
- Weight198 g vs 194 g+2%
- Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.8+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 198 g | 194 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 163.8 mm | 162.9 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 74 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | — |
| Glass protection | Giant rhino glass | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Colours | Black, White | Silvery Grey, Glossy Purple, Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,700 px | 2,772 px |
| Pixel density | 437 ppi | 451 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,000 nits | 1,400 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.4% | 90.6% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,237,843 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,702 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3.8× | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,300 mAh | 4,700 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 100 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 118% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 80 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite messaging | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9 | ColorOS 15 |
