- android.gs
- Compare
- 300 Pro vs Pova 6
Honor 300 Pro vs Tecno Pova 6
What 300 Pro does better (23) and where Pova 6 wins (6) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
300 ProPova 6
| 300 Pro | Pova 6 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.8 mm | 166.2 mm | −2.4 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 76.8 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.9 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 195 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 300 Pro better than Pova 6?
- AnTuTu score2,508,188 vs 575,5384.4×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,655 vs 1,9703.4×
- Peak brightness4,000 nits vs 1,300 nits3.1×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Pova 6: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Pova 6: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Pova 6: No
- 5GYes · Pova 6: No
- Wired charging100 W vs 70 W+43%
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx3+67%
- Rear cameras3 vs 13×
Why is Pova 6 better than 300 Pro?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Battery capacity5,300 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+13%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · 300 Pro: Yes
- Weight199 g vs 195 g+2%
- Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.7+18%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 7.9 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 163.8 mm | 166.2 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx3 |
| Colours | Black, White, Green | Interstellar Blue, Comet Green, Meteorite Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,700 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 437 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,000 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.4% | 85.5% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,508,188 | 575,538 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,655 | 1,970 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,300 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 118% | 75% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 80 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9 | HIOS 14 |
