- android.gs
- Compare
- 300 Pro vs Moto X50 Ultra
Honor 300 Pro vs Motorola Moto X50 Ultra
What 300 Pro does better (4) and where Moto X50 Ultra wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.3Display9.5
9.4Camera9.4
9.5Battery7.7
8.3Features8.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
300 ProMoto X50 Ultra
| 300 Pro | Moto X50 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.8 mm | 161.1 mm | +2.7 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 72.4 mm | +2.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.6 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 197 g | +2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 300 Pro better than Moto X50 Ultra?
- Battery capacity5,300 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+18%
- Peak brightness4,000 nits vs 2,500 nits+60%
- Wireless charging power80 W vs 50 W+60%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 8.6 mm+5%
Why is Moto X50 Ultra better than 300 Pro?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Wired charging100 W vs 125 W+25%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx8+60%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- USB version2 vs 3.1+55%
- Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.6+25%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.4% vs 92.9%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 197 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 163.8 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 72.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Silicone polymer |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Black, White, Green | Forest Grey, Nordic Wood, Peach Fuzz |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | P-OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,220 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,700 px | 2,712 px |
| Pixel density | 437 ppi | 444 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,000 nits | 2,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.4% | 92.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Adreno 735 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,508,188 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,655 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.3" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,300 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | — |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 125 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 118% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 80 W | 50 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 Gen2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.1 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Ultra Wideband | — | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9 | — |
