- android.gs
- Compare
- 300 Pro vs U24 Pro
Honor 300 Pro vs HTC U24 Pro
What 300 Pro does better (16) and where U24 Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
300 ProU24 Pro
| 300 Pro | U24 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.8 mm | 167.1 mm | −3.3 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 74.9 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 9 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 199 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 300 Pro better than U24 Pro?
- AnTuTu score2,508,188 vs 1,016,4612.5×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,655 vs 3,380+97%
- Wired charging100 W vs 60 W+67%
- Stereo speakersYes · U24 Pro: No
- Battery capacity5,300 mAh vs 4,600 mAh+15%
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Optical zoom3× vs 2×+50%
- Wireless charging power80 W vs 15 W5.3×
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · U24 Pro: No
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.63 GHz+14%
- Pixel density437 ppi vs 392 ppi+11%
Why is U24 Pro better than 300 Pro?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx7+40%
- Memory card slotNo · 300 Pro: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · 300 Pro: Yes
- USB version2 vs 3+50%
- Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.9+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 9 mm |
| Height | 163.8 mm | 167.1 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) |
| Colours | Black, White, Green | Space Blue, Twilight White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,700 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 437 ppi | 392 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.4% | 88.3% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 2.63 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Adreno 720 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,508,188 | 1,016,461 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,655 | 3,380 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,300 mAh | 4,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 60 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 118% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 80 W | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 3 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9 | — |
