- android.gs
- Compare
- 30 Pro+ vs NEX 3S 5G
Honor 30 Pro+ vs Vivo NEX 3S 5G
What 30 Pro+ does better (13) and where NEX 3S 5G wins (7) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
30 Pro+NEX 3S 5G
| 30 Pro+ | NEX 3S 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.3 mm | 167.4 mm | −7.1 mm |
| Width | 73.6 mm | 76.1 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 9.4 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 220 g | −30 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 30 Pro+ better than NEX 3S 5G?
- Optical zoom5× vs 2×2.5×
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- Optical stabilisationYes · NEX 3S 5G: No
- Wireless chargingYes · NEX 3S 5G: No
- Stereo speakersYes · NEX 3S 5G: No
- Memory card slotYes · NEX 3S 5G: No
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · NEX 3S 5G: No
- Weight190 g vs 220 g+16%
- Pixel density392 ppi vs 363 ppi+8%
- USB version3 vs 2+50%
Why is NEX 3S 5G better than 30 Pro+?
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+12%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Wired charging40 W vs 44 W+10%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · 30 Pro+: Yes
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.9″+5%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.8% vs 93.6%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 220 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 9.4 mm |
| Height | 160.3 mm | 167.4 mm |
| Width | 73.6 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | Titanium silver, Emerald Green, Midnight Black | Black, Blue, Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | OLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,256 px |
| Pixel density | 392 ppi | 363 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Measured brightness | 586 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.8% | 93.6% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 990 5G | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.86 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP16 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | 510,031 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,191 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.28" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 5× | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 44 W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 27 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -23.8 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 3.1.0 | Funtouch 10.0 |
