- android.gs
- Compare
- 200 vs Aquos R9
Honor 200 vs Sharp Aquos R9
What 200 does better (12) and where Aquos R9 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
200Aquos R9
| 200 | Aquos R9 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.5 mm | 156 mm | +5.5 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 75 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.9 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Weight | 187 g | 195 g | −8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 200 better than Aquos R9?
- Peak brightness4,000 nits vs 2,000 nits2×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Telephoto cameraYes · Aquos R9: No
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+4%
- 4K selfie videoYes · Aquos R9: No
- Pixel density436 ppi vs 396 ppi+10%
- Weight187 g vs 195 g+4%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.5″+3%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 8.9 mm+16%
- Resolution (width)1,200 px vs 1,080 px+11%
Why is Aquos R9 better than 200?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 240 Hz2×
- Memory card slotNo · 200: Yes
- CPU frequency2.63 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+6%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
- Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.9+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 187 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 161.5 mm | 156 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Coral Pink, Moonlight White, Emerald Green, Black | Snow White, Forest Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | OLED | PRO IGZO LTPO OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,664 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 436 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,000 nits | 2,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90% | 88.6% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Qualcomm SM7675-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.63 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Adreno 732 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,002,480 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,214 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2.5× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | — |
| Wired charging | 100 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 114% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 8 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
