- android.gs
- Compare
- 200 vs Reno11 F
Honor 200 vs OPPO Reno11 F
What 200 does better (17) and where Reno11 F wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
200Reno11 F
| 200 | Reno11 F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.5 mm | 161.1 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 74.7 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.5 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 187 g | 177 g | +10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 200 better than Reno11 F?
- RAM16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Peak brightness4,000 nits vs 1,100 nits3.6×
- Wired charging100 W vs 67 W+49%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Reno11 F: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Reno11 F: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Reno11 F: No
- AnTuTu score1,002,480 vs 841,497+19%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,214 vs 2,398+34%
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+4%
- eSIMYes · Reno11 F: No
- Charged in 30 min114% vs 62%+84%
Why is Reno11 F better than 200?
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Memory card slotNo · 200: Yes
- Weight187 g vs 177 g+6%
- Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.7+18%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 7.5 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 187 g | 177 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 161.5 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | — | Panda glass |
| Colours | Coral Pink, Moonlight White, Emerald Green, Black | Palm Green, Ocean Blue, Coral Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,664 px | 2,412 px |
| Pixel density | 436 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,000 nits | 1,100 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90% | 89.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.63 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,002,480 | 841,497 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,214 | 2,398 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2.5× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 114% | 62% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 8 | ColorOS 15 |
