- android.gs
- Compare
- 100 vs Redmi Note 12T Pro
Honor 100 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12T Pro
What 100 does better (14) and where Redmi Note 12T Pro wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.9Display7.0
7.5Performance7.8
8.5Camera7.2
7.7Battery8.0
8.7Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
100Redmi Note 12T Pro
| 100 | Redmi Note 12T Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.9 mm | 163.6 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Width | 74.1 mm | 74.3 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.9 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Weight | 183 g | 200 g | −17 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 100 better than Redmi Note 12T Pro?
- Peak brightness2,600 nits vs 650 nits4×
- Wired charging100 W vs 67 W+49%
- OLED panelYes · Redmi Note 12T Pro: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Redmi Note 12T Pro: No
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Redmi Note 12T Pro: No
- Weight183 g vs 200 g+9%
- Pixel density436 ppi vs 407 ppi+7%
- Charged in 30 min94% vs 75%+25%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.9 mm+14%
Why is Redmi Note 12T Pro better than 100?
- AnTuTu score1,045,163 vs 1,207,095+15%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,478 vs 4,222+21%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · 100: Yes
- CPU frequency2.63 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+18%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,596 vs 1,703+7%
- Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.8+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 183 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 161.9 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 74.1 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Colours | Black, Silver, Blue, Violet | Blue, White, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | OLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,664 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 436 ppi | 407 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | 650 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.4% | 85.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.63 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,045,163 | 1,207,095 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,478 | 4,222 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,596 | 1,703 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,080 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 94% | 75% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, ultrasound proximity, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 7.2 | MIUI 14 |
