- android.gs
- Compare
- 100 Pro vs V29 Pro
Honor 100 Pro vs Vivo V29 Pro
What 100 Pro does better (15) and where V29 Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
100 ProV29 Pro
| 100 Pro | V29 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.7 mm | 164.2 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Width | 74.7 mm | 74.4 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.5 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 188 g | +7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 100 Pro better than V29 Pro?
- AnTuTu score1,769,874 vs 682,2572.6×
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Peak brightness2,600 nits vs 1,300 nits2×
- Wireless chargingYes · V29 Pro: No
- NFCYes · V29 Pro: No
- Stereo speakersYes · V29 Pro: No
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,600 mAh+9%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,069 vs 3,999+27%
- Wired charging100 W vs 80 W+25%
- Optical zoom2.5× vs 2×+25%
- 4K selfie videoYes · V29 Pro: No
Why is V29 Pro better than 100 Pro?
- Weight195 g vs 188 g+4%
- Pixel density437 ppi vs 453 ppi+4%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 7.5 mm+9%
- Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.9+5%
- Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 1,260 px+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 188 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 163.7 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 74.7 mm | 74.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Colours | Black, Silver, Blue, Violet | Himalayan Blue, Space Black, Pink |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,700 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 437 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,029 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.2% | 90.8% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,769,874 | 682,257 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,069 | 3,999 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,634 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 2.5× | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 12.1 h |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 150% | 83% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 66 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -30 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.17 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 7.2 | Funtouch 13 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
