- android.gs
- Compare
- Luma vs Galaxy A27
HMD Luma vs Samsung Galaxy A27
What Luma does better (1) and where Galaxy A27 wins (18) — every spec side by side.
5.2Display8.2
4.6Camera7.9
4.6Battery4.3
3.5Features7.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
LumaGalaxy A27
| Luma | Galaxy A27 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.7 mm | 162.4 mm | +3.3 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 78.2 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 198 g | 200 g | −2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Luma better than Galaxy A27?
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy A27: No
Why is Galaxy A27 better than Luma?
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 1,400 nits2.8×
- OLED panelNo · Luma: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Luma: Yes
- 5GNo · Luma: Yes
- NFCNo · Luma: Yes
- Wired charging18 W vs 25 W+39%
- Pixel density264 ppi vs 385 ppi+46%
- Process12 nm vs 4 nm3×
- CPU frequency1.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+33%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Luma: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 198 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 165.7 mm | 162.4 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 78.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | Titanium, Blue | Black, Blue, Light Green, Light Pink |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,604 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 264 ppi | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 1,400 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.6% | 86.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T615 | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.8 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 694,659 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,973 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 911 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 12 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 12.7 h |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 45% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.78 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 9 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 6 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,200 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 51 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | B |
