- android.gs
- Compare
- Fusion X1 vs Phone (3a) Lite
HMD Fusion X1 vs Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
What Fusion X1 does better (3) and where Phone (3a) Lite wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.9Display8.5
7.2Camera6.8
6.0Battery6.7
7.5Features6.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Fusion X1Phone (3a) Lite
| Fusion X1 | Phone (3a) Lite | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 164 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 78 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.3 mm | = |
| Weight | 202 g | 199 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Fusion X1 better than Phone (3a) Lite?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
- eSIMYes · Phone (3a) Lite: No
Why is Phone (3a) Lite better than Fusion X1?
- Peak brightness600 nits vs 3,000 nits5×
- OLED panelNo · Fusion X1: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Fusion X1: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+14%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 202 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 78 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Panda Glass |
| Colours | Black | Black, White, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | — | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,612 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | — | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | 3,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,228 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 86.7% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Pro |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 691,743 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,996 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 853 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.57" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 15.1 h |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 75% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | — | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -29.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, fingerprint | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.98 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Nothing OS 3.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,400 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 54 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | C |





