- android.gs
- Compare
- Ventus 5G vs Camon 50 Ultra
HAMMER Ventus 5G vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
What Ventus 5G does better (4) and where Camon 50 Ultra wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display9.5
7.0Camera9.1
6.8Battery8.5
9.8Features8.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Ventus 5GCamon 50 Ultra
| Ventus 5G | Camon 50 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.6 mm | 162.4 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 77 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 172 g | 178 g | −6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Ventus 5G better than Camon 50 Ultra?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Memory card slotYes · Camon 50 Ultra: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx9 vs IPx8+12%
- Weight172 g vs 178 g+3%
Why is Camon 50 Ultra better than Ventus 5G?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,160 mAh+23%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- OLED panelNo · Ventus 5G: Yes
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Ventus 5G: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · Ventus 5G: Yes
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Ventus 5G: Yes
- Pixel density388 ppi vs 429 ppi+11%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+8%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 172 g | 178 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 162.6 mm | 162.4 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP69 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx9 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Black | Moonshadow Black, Cypress Green, Nebula Titanium, Luminous Orange, Misty Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,208 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,392 px | 2,644 px |
| Pixel density | 388 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,302 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.5% | 89.6% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7100 | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Mediatek | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC2 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 804,875 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,134 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,050 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 3× |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,160 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 16 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 42% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | — | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes | Under display |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, fingerprint | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
