- android.gs
- Compare
- Ventus 5G vs Camon 50 Pro 4G
HAMMER Ventus 5G vs Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G
What Ventus 5G does better (6) and where Camon 50 Pro 4G wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display9.7
7.0Camera9.0
6.8Battery8.6
9.8Features5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Ventus 5GCamon 50 Pro 4G
| Ventus 5G | Camon 50 Pro 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.6 mm | 162.4 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 77 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.4 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 172 g | 171 g | +1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Ventus 5G better than Camon 50 Pro 4G?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- 5GYes · Camon 50 Pro 4G: No
- eSIMYes · Camon 50 Pro 4G: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx9 vs IPx8+12%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 4+50%
Why is Camon 50 Pro 4G better than Ventus 5G?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,150 mAh+23%
- OLED panelNo · Ventus 5G: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Ventus 5G: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · Ventus 5G: Yes
- Wired charging45 W vs 60 W+33%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Ventus 5G: Yes
- Pixel density388 ppi vs 429 ppi+11%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,208 px+12%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 7.4 mm+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 172 g | 171 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 162.6 mm | 162.4 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP69 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx9 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass 5 | Unspecified |
| Colours | Black | Moonlight black, Malachite green, Nebula titanium, Fir green, Lavender mist, Ethereal blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,208 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,392 px | 2,644 px |
| Pixel density | 388 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.5% | 89.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7100 | Mediatek Helio G200 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Mediatek | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 569,394 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,034 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 3× |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,150 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 60 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 44% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | — | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes | Under display |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, fingerprint | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
