- android.gs
- Compare
- Ranger vs Poco M7 Plus
HAMMER Ranger vs Xiaomi Poco M7 Plus
What Ranger does better (5) and where Poco M7 Plus wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.8Display7.4
5.8Camera4.6
5.5Battery8.3
6.7Features5.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
RangerPoco M7 Plus
| Ranger | Poco M7 Plus | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.9 mm | 168.5 mm | −7.6 mm |
| Width | 80 mm | 80.5 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 12.2 mm | 8.4 mm | +3.8 mm |
| Weight | 269 g | 217 g | +52 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Ranger better than Poco M7 Plus?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
- eSIMYes · Poco M7 Plus: No
Why is Poco M7 Plus better than Ranger?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 144 Hz2.4×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+40%
- 5GNo · Ranger: Yes
- Wired charging30 W vs 33 W+10%
- Pixel density282 ppi vs 374 ppi+33%
- Weight269 g vs 217 g+24%
- Dual SIMNo · Ranger: Yes
- Screen size6″ vs 6.9″+15%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+5%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Thickness12.2 mm vs 8.4 mm+45%
- Screen-to-body ratio71% vs 86.2%+21%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 269 g | 217 g |
| Thickness | 12.2 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 160.9 mm | 168.5 mm |
| Width | 80 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Black | Chrome Silver, Aqua Blue, Carbon Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | IPS | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,560 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 282 ppi | 374 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 850 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 71% | 86.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Mediatek | Qualcomm |
| Process | — | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 595,016 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,228 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 33 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | — | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, fingerprint | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.86 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS 2 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 70 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
