- android.gs
- Compare
- Iron Va vs Pova Curve
HAMMER Iron Va vs Tecno Pova Curve
What Iron Va does better (4) and where Pova Curve wins (18) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.6Display9.2
2.7Camera6.3
8.9Battery8.0
8.5Features7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Iron VaPova Curve
| Iron Va | Pova Curve | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 170 mm | 164.3 mm | +5.7 mm |
| Width | 81 mm | 74.6 mm | +6.4 mm |
| Thickness | 11 mm | 7.5 mm | +3.5 mm |
| Weight | 412 g | 188 g | +224 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Iron Va better than Pova Curve?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx9 vs IPx42.2×
- Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+18%
- Memory card slotYes · Pova Curve: No
- eSIMYes · Pova Curve: No
Why is Pova Curve better than Iron Va?
- Main camera13 MP vs 64 MP4.9×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 144 Hz2.4×
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Storage (max)64 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Weight412 g vs 188 g2.2×
- OLED panelNo · Iron Va: Yes
- 5GNo · Iron Va: Yes
- Pixel density269 ppi vs 393 ppi+46%
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 13 MP2.6×
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 412 g | 188 g |
| Thickness | 11 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 170 mm | 164.3 mm |
| Width | 81 mm | 74.6 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP69 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx9 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Black | Neon Cyan, Magic Silver, Geek Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,612 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,300 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 75.1% | 89.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Cortex A53 | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Mediatek | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | IMG PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 906,240 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,097 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 13 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,500 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 100% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | — | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Under display |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 15 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
