- android.gs
- Compare
- Iron Va vs Hot 60 Pro+
HAMMER Iron Va vs Infinix Hot 60 Pro+
What Iron Va does better (4) and where Hot 60 Pro+ wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.6Display9.8
2.7Camera5.2
8.9Battery5.5
8.5Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Iron VaHot 60 Pro+
| Iron Va | Hot 60 Pro+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 170 mm | 164 mm | +6 mm |
| Width | 81 mm | 75.8 mm | +5.2 mm |
| Thickness | 11 mm | 6 mm | +5 mm |
| Weight | 412 g | 155 g | +257 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Iron Va better than Hot 60 Pro+?
- Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+26%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx9 vs IPx5+80%
- Memory card slotYes · Hot 60 Pro+: No
- eSIMYes · Hot 60 Pro+: No
Why is Hot 60 Pro+ better than Iron Va?
- Main camera13 MP vs 50 MP3.8×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 144 Hz2.4×
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Weight412 g vs 155 g2.7×
- Storage (max)64 GB vs 256 GB4×
- OLED panelNo · Iron Va: Yes
- Pixel density269 ppi vs 440 ppi+64%
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 13 MP2.6×
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Thickness11 mm vs 6 mm+83%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,224 px+70%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 412 g | 155 g |
| Thickness | 11 mm | 6 mm |
| Height | 170 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 81 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP69 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx9 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Black | Sleek Black, Titanium Silver, Coral Tides, Misty Violet, Sonic Yellow, Moco Cyber Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,612 px | 2,720 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 440 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 4,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,650 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 75.1% | 89.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Cortex A53 | Mediatek Helio G200 |
| Chip maker | Mediatek | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | IMG PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 446,336 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,945 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 380 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,500 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.2 h |
| Wired charging | — | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 68% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | — | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Under display |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | XOS 15.1 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
