How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Pixel 9a vs Blade V80 Pro

Google Pixel 9a vs ZTE Blade V80 Pro

What Pixel 9a does better (20) and where Blade V80 Pro wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Google Pixel 9a
Google · 2025Pixel 9a
8.8Score
20 advantages≈ $340
Higher score
vs
ZTE Blade V80 Pro
ZTE · 2025Blade V80 Pro
6.7Score
8 advantages
8.1Display6.8
8.2Camera6.2
5.5Battery5.1
9.8Features5.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pixel 9aBlade V80 Pro
73.3 × 154.78.979 × 1667.7
Pixel 9aBlade V80 ProDifference
Height154.7 mm166 mm−11.3 mm
Width73.3 mm79 mm−5.7 mm
Thickness8.9 mm7.7 mm+1.2 mm
Weight186 g195 g−9 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pixel 9a better than Blade V80 Pro?

  1. Peak brightness2,700 nits vs 1,000 nits2.7×
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
  3. OLED panelYes · Blade V80 Pro: No
  4. Optical stabilisationYes · Blade V80 Pro: No
  5. Wireless chargingYes · Blade V80 Pro: No
  6. Stereo speakersYes · Blade V80 Pro: No
  7. Process4 nm vs 12 nm3×
  8. CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+41%
  9. Wired charging23 W vs 22 W+2%
  10. Pixel density422 ppi vs 317 ppi+33%
  11. Rear cameras2 vs 12×
  12. Ultra-wide cameraYes · Blade V80 Pro: No

Why is Blade V80 Pro better than Pixel 9a?

  1. Main camera48 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
  2. Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  3. Memory card slotNo · Pixel 9a: Yes
  4. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Pixel 9a: Yes
  5. Screen size6.3″ vs 6.8″+7%
  6. Selfie camera13 MP vs 16 MP+23%
  7. Thickness8.9 mm vs 7.7 mm+16%
  8. Screen-to-body ratio83.5% vs 85.6%+3%
Specifications

Side by side

Google Pixel 9aGoogle Pixel 9a≈ $3408.8
Design
Weight186 g195 g
Thickness8.9 mm7.7 mm
Height154.7 mm166 mm
Width73.3 mm79 mm
FrameAluminiumPlastic
BackPlastic—
Ingress protectionIP68IP64
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx4
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 3—
ColoursObsidian, Porcelain, Iris, PeonyWhite
Display
Screen size6.3″6.8″
PanelP-OLEDIPS LCD
OLED panelYesNo
Resolution (width)1,080 px900 px
Resolution (height)2,424 px1,940 px
Pixel density422 ppi317 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2,700 nits1,000 nits
Measured brightness1,930 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio83.5%85.6%
HDRYes—
Performance
ChipsetGoogle Tensor G4Unisoc T7280
Chip makerGoogleUnisoc
Process4 nm12 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.1 GHz2.2 GHz
GPUMali-G715 MP7Mali-G57 MP1
AnTuTu score1,254,417—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,527—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,630—
Memory
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)128 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1—
Memory card slotNoYes
Camera
Main camera48 MP108 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7f/1.8
Main sensor size1/2.0"—
Rear cameras21
Optical stabilisationYesNo
Ultra-wide cameraYesNo
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video4K1080p
4K video frame rate60 fps—
Selfie camera13 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,100 mAh5,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-Po—
Active use (test)12.7 h—
Wired charging23 W22 W
Charged in 30 min47%—
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power8 W—
Connectivity
5GYes—
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.35.2
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 2.0
USB version3.22
Video outputYes—
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEOGLONASS, GALILEO
Features
Stereo speakersYesNo
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Loudspeaker loudness-27.2 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displaySide
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass
SAR (head)0.99 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Major OS updates promised7—
EU label
Energy classB—
Battery charge cycles1,000—
Endurance per cycle52 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare