How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Pixel 9a vs Spark 40

Google Pixel 9a vs Tecno Spark 40

What Pixel 9a does better (18) and where Spark 40 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Google Pixel 9a
Google · 2025Pixel 9a
8.8Score
18 advantages≈ $340
Higher score
vs
Tecno Spark 40
Tecno · 2025Spark 40
6.7Score
6 advantages
8.1Display6.1
8.2Camera4.1
5.5Battery7.0
9.8Features6.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pixel 9aSpark 40
73.3 × 154.78.977.9 × 167.78
Pixel 9aSpark 40Difference
Height154.7 mm167.7 mm−13 mm
Width73.3 mm77.9 mm−4.6 mm
Thickness8.9 mm8 mm+0.9 mm
Weight186 g194 g−8 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pixel 9a better than Spark 40?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
  2. OLED panelYes · Spark 40: No
  3. Optical stabilisationYes · Spark 40: No
  4. Wireless chargingYes · Spark 40: No
  5. Stereo speakersYes · Spark 40: No
  6. Wired charging23 W vs 18 W+28%
  7. Pixel density422 ppi vs 260 ppi+62%
  8. Selfie camera13 MP vs 5 MP2.6×
  9. CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+24%
  10. Rear cameras2 vs 12×
  11. Ultra-wide cameraYes · Spark 40: No
  12. Max video4K vs 1080p

Why is Spark 40 better than Pixel 9a?

  1. Battery capacity5,100 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+18%
  2. Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
  3. Memory card slotNo · Pixel 9a: Yes
  4. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Pixel 9a: Yes
  5. Screen size6.3″ vs 6.8″+7%
  6. Thickness8.9 mm vs 8 mm+11%
Specifications

Side by side

Google Pixel 9aGoogle Pixel 9a≈ $3408.8
Design
Weight186 g194 g
Thickness8.9 mm8 mm
Height154.7 mm167.7 mm
Width73.3 mm77.9 mm
FrameAluminiumPlastic
BackPlasticPlastic
Ingress protectionIP68IP64
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx4
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 3—
ColoursObsidian, Porcelain, Iris, PeonySky Blue, Ink Black, Turquoise Green, Bikaner Red
Display
Screen size6.3″6.8″
PanelP-OLEDIPS LCD
OLED panelYesNo
Resolution (width)1,080 px720 px
Resolution (height)2,424 px1,600 px
Pixel density422 ppi260 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2,700 nits—
Measured brightness1,930 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio83.5%84.2%
HDRYes—
Performance
ChipsetGoogle Tensor G4Mediatek Dimensity 6400
Chip makerGoogleMediaTek
Process4 nm6 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.1 GHz2.5 GHz
GPUMali-G715 MP7Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score1,254,417—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,527—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,630—
Memory
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)128 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1—
Memory card slotNoYes
Camera
Main camera48 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7—
Main sensor size1/2.0"—
Rear cameras21
Optical stabilisationYesNo
Ultra-wide cameraYesNo
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video4K1080p
4K video frame rate60 fps—
Selfie camera13 MP5 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,100 mAh6,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Active use (test)12.7 h—
Wired charging23 W18 W
Charged in 30 min47%—
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power8 W—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.35.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C
USB version3.2—
Video outputYes—
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO—
Features
Stereo speakersYesNo
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Loudspeaker loudness-27.2 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displaySide
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass
SAR (head)0.99 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Major OS updates promised7—
EU label
Energy classB—
Battery charge cycles1,000—
Endurance per cycle52 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare