How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Pixel 9a vs C75x

Google Pixel 9a vs Realme C75x

What Pixel 9a does better (21) and where C75x wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Google Pixel 9a
Google · 2025Pixel 9a
8.8Score
21 advantages≈ $340
Higher score
vs
Realme C75x
Realme · 2025C75x
6.8Score
6 advantages≈ $350
8.1Display5.6
8.2Camera4.1
5.5Battery8.1
9.8Features5.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pixel 9aC75x
73.3 × 154.78.976.2 × 165.78
Pixel 9aC75xDifference
Height154.7 mm165.7 mm−11 mm
Width73.3 mm76.2 mm−2.9 mm
Thickness8.9 mm8 mm+0.9 mm
Weight186 g196 g−10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pixel 9a better than C75x?

  1. Peak brightness2,700 nits vs 625 nits4.3×
  2. OLED panelYes · C75x: No
  3. Optical stabilisationYes · C75x: No
  4. Wireless chargingYes · C75x: No
  5. NFCYes · C75x: No
  6. Stereo speakersYes · C75x: No
  7. Pixel density422 ppi vs 264 ppi+60%
  8. CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 2 GHz+55%
  9. Process4 nm vs 12 nm3×
  10. Selfie camera13 MP vs 5 MP2.6×
  11. Rear cameras2 vs 12×
  12. Ultra-wide cameraYes · C75x: No

Why is C75x better than Pixel 9a?

  1. Wired charging23 W vs 45 W+96%
  2. Battery capacity5,100 mAh vs 5,600 mAh+10%
  3. Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
  4. Memory card slotNo · Pixel 9a: Yes
  5. Screen size6.3″ vs 6.7″+6%
  6. Thickness8.9 mm vs 8 mm+11%
Specifications

Side by side

Google Pixel 9aGoogle Pixel 9a≈ $3408.8
Realme C75xRealme C75x≈ $3506.8
Design
Weight186 g196 g
Thickness8.9 mm8 mm
Height154.7 mm165.7 mm
Width73.3 mm76.2 mm
FrameAluminium—
BackPlastic—
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 3ArmorShell glass
ColoursObsidian, Porcelain, Iris, PeonyCoral Pink, Oceanic Blue
Display
Screen size6.3″6.7″
PanelP-OLEDIPS LCD
OLED panelYesNo
Resolution (width)1,080 px720 px
Resolution (height)2,424 px1,604 px
Pixel density422 ppi264 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2,700 nits625 nits
Measured brightness1,930 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio83.5%84.9%
HDRYes—
Performance
ChipsetGoogle Tensor G4Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
Chip makerGoogleMediaTek
Process4 nm12 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.1 GHz2 GHz
GPUMali-G715 MP7Mali-G52 MC2
AnTuTu score1,254,417—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,527—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,630—
Memory
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)128 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1—
Memory card slotNoYes
Camera
Main camera48 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7f/1.8
Main sensor size1/2.0"1/2.88"
Rear cameras21
Optical stabilisationYesNo
Ultra-wide cameraYesNo
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video4K1080p
4K video frame rate60 fps—
Selfie camera13 MP5 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,100 mAh5,600 mAh
Battery typeLi-Po—
Active use (test)12.7 h—
Wired charging23 W45 W
Charged in 30 min47%—
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power8 W—
Connectivity
5GYes—
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.35
NFCYesNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 2.0
USB version3.22
Video outputYes—
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEOGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesNo
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-27.2 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displaySide
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass
SAR (head)0.99 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Major OS updates promised7—
EU label
Energy classB—
Battery charge cycles1,000—
Endurance per cycle52 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare