How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Pixel 9a vs Tiger 8

Google Pixel 9a vs OSCAL Tiger 8

What Pixel 9a does better (24) and where Tiger 8 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Google Pixel 9a
Google · 2025Pixel 9a
8.8Score
24 advantages≈ $340
Higher score
vs
OSCAL Tiger 8
OSCAL · 2025Tiger 8
6.3Score
6 advantages
8.1Display5.4
8.2Camera4.9
5.5Battery4.6
9.8Features7.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pixel 9aTiger 8
73.3 × 154.78.977.7 × 171.18.5
Pixel 9aTiger 8Difference
Height154.7 mm171.1 mm−16.4 mm
Width73.3 mm77.7 mm−4.4 mm
Thickness8.9 mm8.5 mm+0.4 mm
Weight186 g210 g−24 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pixel 9a better than Tiger 8?

  1. Main camera48 MP vs 16 MP3×
  2. Peak brightness2,700 nits vs 450 nits6×
  3. OLED panelYes · Tiger 8: No
  4. Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
  5. Optical stabilisationYes · Tiger 8: No
  6. Wireless chargingYes · Tiger 8: No
  7. Stereo speakersYes · Tiger 8: No
  8. Wired charging23 W vs 18 W+28%
  9. Pixel density422 ppi vs 260 ppi+62%
  10. CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+41%
  11. Rear cameras2 vs 12×
  12. Ultra-wide cameraYes · Tiger 8: No

Why is Tiger 8 better than Pixel 9a?

  1. Memory card slotNo · Pixel 9a: Yes
  2. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Pixel 9a: Yes
  3. Energy classB vs A
  4. Screen size6.3″ vs 6.9″+9%
  5. Thickness8.9 mm vs 8.5 mm+5%
  6. Endurance per cycle52 h vs 54 h+2%
Specifications

Side by side

Google Pixel 9aGoogle Pixel 9a≈ $3408.8
Design
Weight186 g210 g
Thickness8.9 mm8.5 mm
Height154.7 mm171.1 mm
Width73.3 mm77.7 mm
FrameAluminium—
BackPlastic—
Ingress protectionIP68—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 3—
ColoursObsidian, Porcelain, Iris, PeonyPhantom Black, Glacier Blue
Display
Screen size6.3″6.9″
PanelP-OLEDIPS LCD
OLED panelYesNo
Resolution (width)1,080 px720 px
Resolution (height)2,424 px1,640 px
Pixel density422 ppi260 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2,700 nits450 nits
Measured brightness1,930 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio83.5%84.6%
HDRYes—
Performance
ChipsetGoogle Tensor G4Unisoc T8100
Chip makerGoogleUnisoc
Process4 nm6 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.1 GHz2.2 GHz
GPUMali-G715 MP7Mali-G57
AnTuTu score1,254,417—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,527—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,630—
Memory
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB128 GB
Storage (base)128 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 2.2
Memory card slotNoYes
Camera
Main camera48 MP16 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7f/2.2
Main sensor size1/2.0"1/3.06"
Rear cameras21
Optical stabilisationYesNo
Ultra-wide cameraYesNo
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps30 fps
Selfie camera13 MP8 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,100 mAh5,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Ion
Active use (test)12.7 h—
Wired charging23 W18 W
Charged in 30 min47%—
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power8 W—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.35
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C
USB version3.2—
Video outputYes—
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEOGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesNo
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Loudspeaker loudness-27.2 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displaySide
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity
SAR (head)0.99 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—DokeOS 4.2
Major OS updates promised7—
EU label
Energy classBA
Battery charge cycles1,000800
Endurance per cycle52 h54 h
Repairability classBB
Drop resistance classAC
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare