How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Pixel 9 Pro vs Galaxy M35

Google Pixel 9 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy M35

What Pixel 9 Pro does better (24) and where Galaxy M35 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google · 2024Pixel 9 Pro
9.0Score
24 advantages≈ $370
Higher score
vs
Samsung Galaxy M35
Samsung · 2024Galaxy M35
8.3Score
3 advantages≈ $360
8.0Display7.4
7.4Performance5.7
9.7Camera8.0
4.9Battery7.5
9.8Features8.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pixel 9 ProGalaxy M35
72 × 152.88.578.6 × 162.39.1
Pixel 9 ProGalaxy M35Difference
Height152.8 mm162.3 mm−9.5 mm
Width72 mm78.6 mm−6.6 mm
Thickness8.5 mm9.1 mm−0.6 mm
Weight199 g222 g−23 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pixel 9 Pro better than Galaxy M35?

  1. RAM16 GB vs 8 GB2×
  2. Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 1,000 nits3×
  3. Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
  4. Telephoto cameraYes · Galaxy M35: No
  5. Wireless chargingYes · Galaxy M35: No
  6. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,850 vs 2,758+40%
  7. AnTuTu score838,931 vs 768,538+9%
  8. Selfie camera42 MP vs 13 MP3.2×
  9. Wired charging27 W vs 25 W+8%
  10. CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+29%
  11. Pixel density495 ppi vs 390 ppi+27%
  12. Max video8K vs 4K

Why is Galaxy M35 better than Pixel 9 Pro?

  1. Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+28%
  2. Memory card slotNo · Pixel 9 Pro: Yes
  3. Screen size6.3″ vs 6.6″+5%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight199 g222 g
Thickness8.5 mm9.1 mm
Height152.8 mm162.3 mm
Width72 mm78.6 mm
FrameAluminiumPlastic
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+
ColoursPorcelain, Rose Quartz, Hazel, ObsidianDark Blue, Light Blue, Gray
Display
Screen size6.3″6.6″
PanelLTPO OLEDSuper AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)Yes—
Resolution (width)1,280 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,856 px2,340 px
Pixel density495 ppi390 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3,000 nits1,000 nits
Measured brightness2,331 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio87.6%83.8%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetGoogle Tensor G4Exynos 1380
Chip makerGoogleExynos
Process4 nm5 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.1 GHz2.4 GHz
GPUMali-G715 MC7Mali-G68 MP5
AnTuTu score838,931768,538
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,8502,758
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,574—
Memory
RAM16 GB8 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB256 GB
Storage (base)128 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1—
Memory card slotNoYes
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.31"1/1.96"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom5×—
Max video8K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps30 fps
Selfie camera42 MP13 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity4,700 mAh6,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-IonLi-Ion
Active use (test)13.2 h—
Wired charging27 W25 W
Charged in 30 min55%52%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power21 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.35.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 2.0
USB version3.22
Video outputYes—
Ultra WidebandYes—
Satellite messagingYes—
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-24.3 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicSide
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature)Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)0.99 W/kg0.31 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—One UI 8.5
Major OS updates promised7—
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,000—
Endurance per cycle51 h—
Repairability classC—
Drop resistance classA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare