- android.gs
- Compare
- Pixel 6a vs Armor X10 Pro
Google Pixel 6a vs UleFone Armor X10 Pro
What Pixel 6a does better (25) and where Armor X10 Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.3Display2.8
7.7Camera3.2
2.9Battery5.2
9.4Features6.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pixel 6aArmor X10 Pro
| Pixel 6a | Armor X10 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 152.2 mm | 158.2 mm | −6 mm |
| Width | 71.8 mm | 76.7 mm | −4.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 14.6 mm | −5.7 mm |
| Weight | 178 g | 256 g | −78 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pixel 6a better than Armor X10 Pro?
- Wired charging18 W vs 10 W+80%
- RAM6 GB vs 4 GB+50%
- OLED panelYes · Armor X10 Pro: No
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Armor X10 Pro: No
- 5GYes · Armor X10 Pro: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Armor X10 Pro: No
- Pixel density429 ppi vs 295 ppi+45%
- Weight178 g vs 256 g+44%
- Process5 nm vs 12 nm2.4×
- CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz+40%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
Why is Armor X10 Pro better than Pixel 6a?
- Main camera12 MP vs 20 MP+64%
- Battery capacity4,410 mAh vs 5,180 mAh+17%
- Memory card slotNo · Pixel 6a: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Pixel 6a: Yes
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx8+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 178 g | 256 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 14.6 mm |
| Height | 152.2 mm | 158.2 mm |
| Width | 71.8 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | — |
| Colours | Chalk, Charcoal, Sage | Black/Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.1″ | 5.4″ |
| Panel | OLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 1,440 px |
| Pixel density | 429 ppi | 295 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 876 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83% | 63.2% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Google Tensor | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | |
| Process | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP20 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,015,493 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,664 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,854 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 12 MP | 20 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.55" | 1/2.78" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,410 mAh | 5,180 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 10 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 42% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | — |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.99 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Stock Android | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 5 | — |
