- android.gs
- Compare
- Pixel 3a vs Redmi 9 Prime
Google Pixel 3a vs Xiaomi Redmi 9 Prime
What Pixel 3a does better (12) and where Redmi 9 Prime wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Display3.1
6.3Camera5.0
2.6Battery5.8
7.1Features3.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pixel 3aRedmi 9 Prime
| Pixel 3a | Redmi 9 Prime | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 151.3 mm | 163.3 mm | −12 mm |
| Width | 70.1 mm | 77 mm | −6.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 9.1 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 147 g | 198 g | −51 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pixel 3a better than Redmi 9 Prime?
- OLED panelYes · Redmi 9 Prime: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Redmi 9 Prime: No
- NFCYes · Redmi 9 Prime: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Redmi 9 Prime: No
- Weight147 g vs 198 g+35%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- eSIMYes · Redmi 9 Prime: No
- Peak brightness464 nits vs 400 nits+16%
- Pixel density441 ppi vs 395 ppi+12%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/2.2+22%
- Process10 nm vs 12 nm+20%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 9.1 mm+11%
Why is Redmi 9 Prime better than Pixel 3a?
- Battery capacity3,000 mAh vs 5,020 mAh+67%
- Storage (max)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Main camera12 MP vs 13 MP+7%
- Memory card slotNo · Pixel 3a: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Pixel 3a: Yes
- Screen size5.6″ vs 6.5″+17%
- Screen-to-body ratio75% vs 83.2%+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 147 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 9.1 mm |
| Height | 151.3 mm | 163.3 mm |
| Width | 70.1 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Asahi Dragontrail Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Just Black, Clearly White, Purple-ish | Space Blue, Mint Green, Matte Black, Sunrise Flare |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 5.6″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | OLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,220 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 441 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 464 nits | 400 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 75% | 83.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM670 Snapdragon 670 | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 10 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 615 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 322,015 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,564 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 196 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 12 MP | 13 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.55" | 1/3.1" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 3,000 mAh | 5,020 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Rear |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.39 W/kg | 0.85 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Stock Android | MIUI 11 |
