How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Pixel 10a vs Xever 8

Google Pixel 10a vs RugOne Xever 8

What Pixel 10a does better (19) and where Xever 8 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Google Pixel 10a
Google · 2026Pixel 10a
8.9Score
19 advantages≈ $410
Higher score
vs
RugOne Xever 8
RugOne · 2026Xever 8
6.8Score
5 advantages≈ $370
8.1Display6.0
8.2Camera6.4
7.3Battery3.2
9.8Features8.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pixel 10aXever 8
73 × 153.9980 × 16814
Pixel 10aXever 8Difference
Height153.9 mm168 mm−14.1 mm
Width73 mm80 mm−7 mm
Thickness9 mm14 mm−5 mm
Weight183 g320 g−137 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pixel 10a better than Xever 8?

  1. Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 680 nits4.4×
  2. Major OS updates promised7 vs 32.3×
  3. Wired charging30 W vs 18 W+67%
  4. OLED panelYes · Xever 8: No
  5. Optical stabilisationYes · Xever 8: No
  6. Wireless chargingYes · Xever 8: No
  7. Weight183 g vs 320 g+75%
  8. Battery capacity5,100 mAh vs 4,800 mAh+6%
  9. CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+41%
  10. Ultra-wide cameraYes · Xever 8: No
  11. Max video4K vs 1080p
  12. 4K selfie videoYes · Xever 8: No

Why is Xever 8 better than Pixel 10a?

  1. Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
  2. Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
  3. Memory card slotNo · Pixel 10a: Yes
  4. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Pixel 10a: Yes
  5. Screen size6.3″ vs 6.5″+3%
Specifications

Side by side

Google Pixel 10aGoogle Pixel 10a≈ $4108.9
RugOne Xever 8RugOne Xever 8≈ $3706.8
Design
Weight183 g320 g
Thickness9 mm14 mm
Height153.9 mm168 mm
Width73 mm80 mm
FrameAluminium—
BackPlastic—
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 7iCorning Gorilla Glass 3
ColoursObsidian, Fog, Berry, LavenderBlack, Sand Dune
Display
Screen size6.3″6.5″
PanelP-OLEDIPS LCD
OLED panelYesNo
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,424 px2,400 px
Pixel density422 ppi405 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3,000 nits680 nits
Measured brightness2,169 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio84.3%75.9%
HDRYes—
Performance
ChipsetGoogle Tensor G4MediaTek Helio G200
Chip makerGoogleMediaTek
Process4 nm—
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.1 GHz2.2 GHz
GPUMali-G715 MP7Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score1,269,880—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,545—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,683—
Memory
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)128 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 2.2
Memory card slotNoYes
Camera
Main camera48 MP64 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7f/1.9
Main sensor size1/2.0"1/1.7"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesNo
Ultra-wide cameraYesNo
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video4K1080p
4K video frame rate60 fps—
Selfie camera13 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,100 mAh4,800 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Active use (test)15.2 h—
Wired charging30 W18 W
Charged in 30 min50%—
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power10 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYes—
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 5
Bluetooth65.2
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 2.0
USB version3.22
Video outputYes—
Satellite messagingYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEOGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Loudspeaker loudness-26.8 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displaySide
BarometerYesYes
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)0.99 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Major OS updates promised73
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,000—
Endurance per cycle53 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare