- android.gs
- Compare
- Pixel 10 Pro XL vs Galaxy S25 Ultra
Google Pixel 10 Pro XL vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
What Pixel 10 Pro XL does better (9) and where Galaxy S25 Ultra wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Display9.1
8.6Performance9.1
9.7Camera9.8
7.1Battery7.1
9.8Features9.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pixel 10 Pro XLGalaxy S25 Ultra
| Pixel 10 Pro XL | Galaxy S25 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.8 mm | 162.8 mm | = |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 77.6 mm | −1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.2 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 232 g | 218 g | +14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pixel 10 Pro XL better than Galaxy S25 Ultra?
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+4%
- Measured brightness2,340 nits vs 1,417 nits+65%
- Selfie camera42 MP vs 12 MP3.5×
- Peak brightness3,300 nits vs 2,600 nits+27%
- Repairability classB vs C
- Wireless charging power25 W vs 15 W+67%
- Bluetooth6 vs 5.4+11%
- Endurance per cycle49 h vs 45 h+8%
- Charged in 30 min70% vs 65%+8%
Why is Galaxy S25 Ultra better than Pixel 10 Pro XL?
- Main camera50 MP vs 200 MP4×
- AnTuTu score1,423,216 vs 2,207,809+55%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,497 vs 9,846+52%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme3,332 vs 6,6872×
- Active use (test)12.5 h vs 14.8 h+18%
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
- Battery charge cycles1,000 vs 2,0002×
- CPU frequency3.78 GHz vs 4.47 GHz+18%
- Weight232 g vs 218 g+6%
- Pixel density486 ppi vs 498 ppi+2%
- Rear cameras3 vs 4+33%
- Resolution (width)1,344 px vs 1,440 px+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 232 g | 218 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 162.8 mm | 162.8 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 77.6 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Titanium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Corning Gorilla Armor 2 |
| Colours | Moonstone, Jade, Porcelain, Obsidian | Titanium Silver Blue, Titanium Black, Titanium White Silver, Titanium Gray, Titanium Jade Green, Titanium Jet Black, Titanium Pink Gold |
| Stylus | — | Yes |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | LTPO OLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,344 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,992 px | 3,120 px |
| Pixel density | 486 ppi | 498 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,300 nits | 2,600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 2,340 nits | 1,417 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88% | 92.5% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Google Tensor G5 | Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.78 GHz | 4.47 GHz |
| GPU | PowerVR DXT-48-1536 | Adreno 830 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,423,216 | 2,207,809 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,497 | 9,846 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,332 | 6,687 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.31" | 1/1.3" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 4 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 5× | 5× |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 42 MP | 12 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | 12.5 h | 14.8 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 70% | 65% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 25 W | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite messaging | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.3 LUFS | -24.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | 0.99 W/kg | 1.25 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 9 |
| Major OS updates promised | 7 | 7 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | B |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | 2,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 49 h | 45 h |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| Drop resistance class | A | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Google Pixel 10 Pro XLvsXiaomi Poco F79.49.3vs
Google Pixel 10 Pro XLvsHonor 400 Pro9.49.5vs
Google Pixel 10 Pro XLvsOPPO Reno149.49.4vs
Google Pixel 10 Pro XLvsGoogle Pixel 9 Pro XL9.49.3vs
Google Pixel 10 Pro XLvsXiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)9.49.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultra9.59.6