- android.gs
- Compare
- M12 vs Redmi Note 9 Pro
Gionee M12 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
What M12 does better (2) and where Redmi Note 9 Pro wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.1Display4.2
6.0Camera7.2
7.5Battery6.8
2.4Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
M12Redmi Note 9 Pro
| M12 | Redmi Note 9 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.9 mm | 165.8 mm | −1.9 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 76.7 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 9.3 mm | 8.8 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Weight | 196 g | 209 g | −13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is M12 better than Redmi Note 9 Pro?
- Weight196 g vs 209 g+7%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Redmi Note 9 Pro better than M12?
- NFCNo · M12: Yes
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- Pixel density268 ppi vs 395 ppi+47%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+15%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Process12 nm vs 8 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
- Thickness9.3 mm vs 8.8 mm+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio82.3% vs 84.5%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 196 g | 209 g |
| Thickness | 9.3 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 163.9 mm | 165.8 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Magic Green, Dazzling Black | Tropical Green, Glacier White, Interstellar Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 268 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 614 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.3% | 84.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762D Helio A25 - model 1 | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 618 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 279,625 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,785 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 315 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 5,020 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.66 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | MIUI 11 |
Related comparisons
vs
Gionee M12vsTecno Camon 16 Pro5.45.4
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProvsXiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro6.95.9
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 ProvsXiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro7.45.9
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 ProvsXiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro6.85.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy S24 UltravsXiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro9.35.9
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro7.25.9
