- android.gs
- Compare
- GX50 vs X200T
Gigaset GX50 vs Vivo X200T
What GX50 does better (2) and where X200T wins (17) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
GX50X200T
| GX50 | X200T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 172 mm | 160 mm | +12 mm |
| Width | 82.7 mm | 74.3 mm | +8.4 mm |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | 8 mm | +1.9 mm |
| Weight | 248 g | 203 g | +45 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GX50 better than X200T?
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Memory card slotYes · X200T: No
Why is X200T better than GX50?
- Wired charging33 W vs 90 W2.7×
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 5,000 nits6.2×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Battery capacity5,100 mAh vs 6,200 mAh+22%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · GX50: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · GX50: Yes
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 3.63 GHz+45%
- Wireless charging power18 W vs 40 W2.2×
- Weight248 g vs 203 g+22%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Pixel density400 ppi vs 460 ppi+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 248 g | 203 g |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 172 mm | 160 mm |
| Width | 82.7 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Schott Xensation Core |
| Colours | Black | Seaside Lilac, Stellar Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,392 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 5,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 78% | 90.4% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ |
| Chip maker | Mediatek | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 3.63 GHz |
| GPU | Mali G615 MC2 | Immortalis-G925 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 2,725,989 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 8,430 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 6,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 70% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 18 W | 40 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.09 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Stock Android | OriginOS 6 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 5 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 52 h | — |
| Repairability class | A | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
