- android.gs
- Compare
- 5 vs Reno8 T
Fairphone 5 vs OPPO Reno8 T
What 5 does better (16) and where Reno8 T wins (7) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
5Reno8 T
| 5 | Reno8 T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.6 mm | 160.8 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 73.8 mm | +2 mm |
| Thickness | 9.6 mm | 7.8 mm | +1.8 mm |
| Weight | 212 g | 180 g | +32 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 5 better than Reno8 T?
- Optical stabilisationYes · Reno8 T: No
- 5GYes · Reno8 T: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,886 vs 1,978+46%
- AnTuTu score584,498 vs 534,715+9%
- CPU frequency2.7 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+23%
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Reno8 T: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · Reno8 T: No
- eSIMYes · Reno8 T: No
- Pixel density459 ppi vs 409 ppi+12%
- Peak brightness880 nits vs 800 nits+10%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
Why is Reno8 T better than 5?
- Main camera50 MP vs 100 MP2×
- Battery capacity4,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+19%
- Wired charging30 W vs 33 W+10%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · 5: Yes
- Weight212 g vs 180 g+18%
- Thickness9.6 mm vs 7.8 mm+23%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.7+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 212 g | 180 g |
| Thickness | 9.6 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 161.6 mm | 160.8 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 73.8 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP55 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Matte Black, Sky Blue, Transparent | Black Starlight, Orange Sunset |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,700 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 459 ppi | 409 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 880 nits | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | 772 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.7% | 84.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm QCM6490 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.7 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 643 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 584,498 | 534,715 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,886 | 1,978 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 378 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 100 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.49" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,200 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 75% | 54% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -31 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.4 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Stock Android | ColorOS 14 |
| Major OS updates promised | 5 | — |
