- android.gs
- Compare
- Hard Case P28K vs Galaxy A55
Energizer Hard Case P28K vs Samsung Galaxy A55
What Hard Case P28K does better (7) and where Galaxy A55 wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Display7.4
6.6Camera8.3
8.8Battery5.0
6.0Features8.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hard Case P28KGalaxy A55
| Hard Case P28K | Galaxy A55 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 178.1 mm | 161.1 mm | +17 mm |
| Width | 84 mm | 77.4 mm | +6.6 mm |
| Thickness | 27.8 mm | 8.2 mm | +19.6 mm |
| Weight | 570 g | 213 g | +357 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hard Case P28K better than Galaxy A55?
- Battery capacity28,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh5.6×
- Wired charging33 W vs 25 W+32%
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+3%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
Why is Galaxy A55 better than Hard Case P28K?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Weight570 g vs 213 g2.7×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- OLED panelNo · Hard Case P28K: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Hard Case P28K: Yes
- 5GNo · Hard Case P28K: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Hard Case P28K: Yes
- Thickness27.8 mm vs 8.2 mm3.4×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.75 GHz+25%
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Hard Case P28K: Yes
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · Hard Case P28K: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 570 g | 213 g |
| Thickness | 27.8 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 178.1 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 84 mm | 77.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | Black | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 390 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,010 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 73% | 85.8% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Exynos 1480 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Exynos |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.75 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Xclipse 530 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 635,598 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,259 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,024 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 28,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 13.4 h |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 55% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Under display |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.68 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
