- android.gs
- Compare
- SMART.8 vs Camon 50 Ultra
Emporia SMART.8 vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
What SMART.8 does better (2) and where Camon 50 Ultra wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display9.5
6.3Camera9.1
3.9Battery8.5
8.0Features8.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
SMART.8Camon 50 Ultra
| SMART.8 | Camon 50 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 157 mm | 162.4 mm | −5.4 mm |
| Width | 72 mm | 77 mm | −5 mm |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 7.8 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Weight | 175 g | 178 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is SMART.8 better than Camon 50 Ultra?
- Wireless chargingYes · Camon 50 Ultra: No
- Memory card slotYes · Camon 50 Ultra: No
Why is Camon 50 Ultra better than SMART.8?
- RAM6 GB vs 12 GB2×
- Battery capacity3,880 mAh vs 6,160 mAh+59%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 512 GB4×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Optical stabilisationNo · SMART.8: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · SMART.8: Yes
- Wired charging33 W vs 45 W+36%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · SMART.8: Yes
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.8″+7%
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 175 g | 178 g |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 157 mm | 162.4 mm |
| Width | 72 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Black | Moonshadow Black, Cypress Green, Nebula Titanium, Luminous Orange, Misty Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,208 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,670 px | 2,644 px |
| Pixel density | — | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,302 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 89.6% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Mediatek | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali G615 MC2 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 804,875 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,134 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,050 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 3× |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 3,880 mAh | 6,160 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 16 h |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 42% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Under display |
| Sensors | fingerprint | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
