- android.gs
- Compare
- SMART.8 vs Moto G Stylus (2026)
Emporia SMART.8 vs Motorola Moto G Stylus (2026)
What SMART.8 does better (2) and where Moto G Stylus (2026) wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display9.3
6.3Camera8.3
3.9Battery7.1
8.0Features8.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
SMART.8Moto G Stylus (2026)
| SMART.8 | Moto G Stylus (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 157 mm | 162.2 mm | −5.2 mm |
| Width | 72 mm | 74.8 mm | −2.8 mm |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 8.3 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 175 g | 192 g | −17 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is SMART.8 better than Moto G Stylus (2026)?
- Weight175 g vs 192 g+10%
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+4%
Why is Moto G Stylus (2026) better than SMART.8?
- Wired charging33 W vs 68 W2.1×
- Battery capacity3,880 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+34%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · SMART.8: Yes
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · SMART.8: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · SMART.8: Yes
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.7″+5%
- Thickness9 mm vs 8.3 mm+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 175 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 157 mm | 162.2 mm |
| Width | 72 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Eco leather |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Black | Pantone: Coal Smoke, Lavender Mist |
| Stylus | — | Yes |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,220 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,670 px | 2,712 px |
| Pixel density | — | 444 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 5,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,453 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 89.3% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Mediatek | Qualcomm |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali G615 MC2 | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 659,683 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,894 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 871 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 3,880 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 12.2 h |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 68 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 71% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | 15 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -20.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Under display |
| Sensors | fingerprint | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Hello UI |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
