- android.gs
- Compare
- V30T vs Redmi K70 Pro
Doogee V30T vs Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro
What V30T does better (6) and where Redmi K70 Pro wins (19) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.7Display9.2
8.8Camera8.8
9.3Battery7.8
8.9Features9.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
V30TRedmi K70 Pro
| V30T | Redmi K70 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 178.4 mm | 160.9 mm | +17.5 mm |
| Width | 83.1 mm | 75 mm | +8.1 mm |
| Thickness | 17.8 mm | 8.2 mm | +9.6 mm |
| Weight | 376 g | 209 g | +167 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V30T better than Redmi K70 Pro?
- Battery capacity10,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh2.2×
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Wireless chargingYes · Redmi K70 Pro: No
- Memory card slotYes · Redmi K70 Pro: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Redmi K70 Pro: No
Why is Redmi K70 Pro better than V30T?
- RAM12 GB vs 24 GB2×
- Wired charging66 W vs 120 W+82%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
- OLED panelNo · V30T: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · V30T: Yes
- Weight376 g vs 209 g+80%
- Charged in 30 min55% vs 167%3×
- Pixel density401 ppi vs 526 ppi+31%
- Thickness17.8 mm vs 8.2 mm2.2×
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+27%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 376 g | 209 g |
| Thickness | 17.8 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 178.4 mm | 160.9 mm |
| Width | 83.1 mm | 75 mm |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Marble Black, Rose Gold, Galaxy Gray | Black, Silver, Blue/Green, Lamborgini Green, Lamborgini Yellow |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | OLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 401 ppi | 526 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 4,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,016 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 70.4% | 89% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 750 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 2,486,114 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 7,192 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 4,359 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 24 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.52" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,800 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 55% | 167% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS |
