- android.gs
- Compare
- V Max Pro vs Galaxy M35
Doogee V Max Pro vs Samsung Galaxy M35
What V Max Pro does better (10) and where Galaxy M35 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.6Display7.4
7.3Camera8.0
8.8Battery7.5
8.9Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
V Max ProGalaxy M35
| V Max Pro | Galaxy M35 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 178.5 mm | 162.3 mm | +16.2 mm |
| Width | 83.1 mm | 78.6 mm | +4.5 mm |
| Thickness | 26.3 mm | 9.1 mm | +17.2 mm |
| Weight | 536 g | 222 g | +314 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V Max Pro better than Galaxy M35?
- Battery capacity22,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh3.7×
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Wired charging33 W vs 25 W+32%
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+8%
- Pixel density401 ppi vs 390 ppi+3%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 13 MP+23%
Why is Galaxy M35 better than V Max Pro?
- Weight536 g vs 222 g2.4×
- Peak brightness480 nits vs 1,000 nits2.1×
- OLED panelNo · V Max Pro: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · V Max Pro: Yes
- Thickness26.3 mm vs 9.1 mm2.9×
- 4K selfie videoNo · V Max Pro: Yes
- Process6 nm vs 5 nm+20%
- Screen-to-body ratio70.3% vs 83.8%+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 536 g | 222 g |
| Thickness | 26.3 mm | 9.1 mm |
| Height | 178.5 mm | 162.3 mm |
| Width | 83.1 mm | 78.6 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | Black, Gray | Dark Blue, Light Blue, Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 401 ppi | 390 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 480 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 70.3% | 83.8% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 | Exynos 1380 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Exynos |
| Process | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 768,538 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,758 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.52" | 1/1.96" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 22,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 52% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.31 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 8.5 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | D | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,300 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 147 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
