- android.gs
- Compare
- S99 vs Galaxy M53
Doogee S99 vs Samsung Galaxy M53
What S99 does better (6) and where Galaxy M53 wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.1Display6.8
7.4Camera7.6
8.0Battery5.3
6.0Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
S99Galaxy M53
| S99 | Galaxy M53 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 172 mm | 164.7 mm | +7.3 mm |
| Width | 82 mm | 77 mm | +5 mm |
| Thickness | 15.5 mm | 7.4 mm | +8.1 mm |
| Weight | 320 g | 176 g | +144 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is S99 better than Galaxy M53?
- Wireless chargingYes · Galaxy M53: No
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- Wired charging33 W vs 25 W+32%
- Pixel density409 ppi vs 394 ppi+4%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Charged in 30 min45% vs 44%+2%
Why is Galaxy M53 better than S99?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- OLED panelNo · S99: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 5GNo · S99: Yes
- Weight320 g vs 176 g+82%
- Thickness15.5 mm vs 7.4 mm2.1×
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 4K selfie videoNo · S99: Yes
- CPU frequency2.05 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+17%
- Screen size6.3″ vs 6.7″+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio69.1% vs 85.3%+23%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 320 g | 176 g |
| Thickness | 15.5 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 172 mm | 164.7 mm |
| Width | 82 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Gold, Black | Green, Blue, Brown |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.3″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 802 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 69.1% | 85.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 | Mediatek Dimensity 900 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.05 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 680,628 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,449 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 609 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.52" | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 45% | 44% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -29.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.6 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 5.1 |
