- android.gs
- Compare
- S200X vs Galaxy M35
Doogee S200X vs Samsung Galaxy M35
What S200X does better (8) and where Galaxy M35 wins (9) — every spec side by side.
6.9Display7.4
7.1Camera8.0
8.6Battery7.5
8.2Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
S200XGalaxy M35
| S200X | Galaxy M35 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 179.5 mm | 162.3 mm | +17.2 mm |
| Width | 82.5 mm | 78.6 mm | +3.9 mm |
| Thickness | 16 mm | 9.1 mm | +6.9 mm |
| Weight | 365 g | 222 g | +143 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is S200X better than Galaxy M35?
- Battery capacity10,100 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+68%
- Main camera100 MP vs 50 MP2×
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Wired charging33 W vs 25 W+32%
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+8%
- Selfie camera20 MP vs 13 MP+54%
Why is Galaxy M35 better than S200X?
- OLED panelNo · S200X: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · S200X: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · S200X: Yes
- Weight365 g vs 222 g+64%
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · S200X: Yes
- 4K selfie videoNo · S200X: Yes
- Thickness16 mm vs 9.1 mm+76%
- Process6 nm vs 5 nm+20%
- Screen-to-body ratio73.6% vs 83.8%+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 365 g | 222 g |
| Thickness | 16 mm | 9.1 mm |
| Height | 179.5 mm | 162.3 mm |
| Width | 82.5 mm | 78.6 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | Black, Yellow, Green | Dark Blue, Light Blue, Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 392 ppi | 390 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 73.6% | 83.8% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 | Exynos 1380 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Exynos |
| Process | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 768,538 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,758 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 100 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.96" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 20 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,100 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 52% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.31 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 8.5 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 98 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
