- android.gs
- Compare
- Note59 Pro vs Moto G Play (2026)
Doogee Note59 Pro vs Motorola Moto G Play (2026)
What Note59 Pro does better (7) and where Moto G Play (2026) wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Display6.2
5.5Camera3.8
7.3Battery7.7
7.1Features9.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Note59 ProMoto G Play (2026)
| Note59 Pro | Moto G Play (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168 mm | 167.2 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Width | 77.5 mm | 76.4 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.5 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 202 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Note59 Pro better than Moto G Play (2026)?
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 64 GB4×
- Main camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Battery capacity6,250 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+20%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 64 GB4×
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/2.2+22%
Why is Moto G Play (2026) better than Note59 Pro?
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 1,000 nits2.2×
- Stereo speakersNo · Note59 Pro: Yes
- eSIMNo · Note59 Pro: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Note59 Pro: Yes
- CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+4%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 202 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 168 mm | 167.2 mm |
| Width | 77.5 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Eco leather |
| Glass protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Black, Blue, White | Pantone Tapestry |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 1,604 px |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 262 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 920 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.5% | 84.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T8200 | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 402,175 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,074 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 384 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.5" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,250 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 17.4 h |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -21 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Hello UI |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | C | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,100 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 52 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
