- android.gs
- Compare
- Note 58 Pro vs Galaxy A17
Doogee Note 58 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A17
What Note 58 Pro does better (5) and where Galaxy A17 wins (20) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.2Display7.0
3.7Camera7.8
6.5Battery3.9
5.0Features7.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Note 58 ProGalaxy A17
| Note 58 Pro | Galaxy A17 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168 mm | 164.4 mm | +3.6 mm |
| Width | 77.5 mm | 77.9 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 7.5 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 192 g | +7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Note 58 Pro better than Galaxy A17?
- Battery capacity6,250 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+25%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Repairability classB vs C
- Drop resistance classA vs B
- Endurance per cycle54 h vs 44 h+24%
Why is Galaxy A17 better than Note 58 Pro?
- Main camera16 MP vs 50 MP3.1×
- Wired charging10 W vs 25 W2.5×
- OLED panelNo · Note 58 Pro: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Note 58 Pro: Yes
- 5GNo · Note 58 Pro: Yes
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 800 nits+78%
- Pixel density260 ppi vs 385 ppi+48%
- Process12 nm vs 5 nm2.4×
- CPU frequency1.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+33%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Note 58 Pro: Yes
- eSIMNo · Note 58 Pro: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 168 mm | 164.4 mm |
| Width | 77.5 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Black, Gold | Black, Gray, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 738 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.5% | 86% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T7250 | Exynos 1330 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Exynos |
| Process | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.8 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G68 MP2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 435,787 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,048 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 365 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,250 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.8 h |
| Wired charging | 10 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 48% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.67 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 6 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | C | B |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,100 | 1,200 |
| Endurance per cycle | 54 h | 44 h |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| Drop resistance class | A | B |
