- android.gs
- Compare
- Fire 6 Power vs Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Doogee Fire 6 Power vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
What Fire 6 Power does better (4) and where Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G wins (19) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.7Display8.2
4.6Camera8.5
8.8Battery5.1
6.7Features4.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Fire 6 PowerRedmi Note 13 Pro 4G
| Fire 6 Power | Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 174.1 mm | 161.1 mm | +13 mm |
| Width | 81.2 mm | 75 mm | +6.2 mm |
| Thickness | 20.7 mm | 8 mm | +12.7 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Fire 6 Power better than Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G?
- Battery capacity15,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh3.1×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Stereo speakersYes · Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G: No
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Why is Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G better than Fire 6 Power?
- Main camera50 MP vs 200 MP4×
- Wired charging33 W vs 67 W2×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- OLED panelNo · Fire 6 Power: Yes
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Fire 6 Power: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Pixel density269 ppi vs 395 ppi+47%
- Thickness20.7 mm vs 8 mm2.6×
- CPU frequency1.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+38%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | — | 188 g |
| Thickness | 20.7 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 174.1 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 81.2 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Green | Midnight Black, Lavender Purple, Forest Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,612 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,047 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 73.1% | 88.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 382,881 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,844 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.4" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 15,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.6 h |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 94% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | D | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,100 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 105 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G7.18.5
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 ProvsXiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G8.07.1
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 ProvsXiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G8.97.1
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G9.27.1
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G7.57.1
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4GvsTecno Spark 30 Pro7.17.1

