- android.gs
- Compare
- Fire 5 Pro vs Moto G Play (2026)
Doogee Fire 5 Pro vs Motorola Moto G Play (2026)
What Fire 5 Pro does better (4) and where Moto G Play (2026) wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.8Display6.2
3.6Camera3.8
8.0Battery7.7
6.0Features9.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Fire 5 ProMoto G Play (2026)
| Fire 5 Pro | Moto G Play (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 176.5 mm | 167.2 mm | +9.3 mm |
| Width | 82.5 mm | 76.4 mm | +6.1 mm |
| Thickness | 18.7 mm | 8.5 mm | +10.2 mm |
| Weight | 389 g | 202 g | +187 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Fire 5 Pro better than Moto G Play (2026)?
- Battery capacity13,000 mAh vs 5,200 mAh2.5×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/2.2+10%
Why is Moto G Play (2026) better than Fire 5 Pro?
- Main camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
- Peak brightness400 nits vs 1,000 nits2.5×
- 5GNo · Fire 5 Pro: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Fire 5 Pro: Yes
- Weight389 g vs 202 g+93%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Thickness18.7 mm vs 8.5 mm2.2×
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- eSIMNo · Fire 5 Pro: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Fire 5 Pro: Yes
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+20%
- Screen-to-body ratio71.9% vs 84.7%+18%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 389 g | 202 g |
| Thickness | 18.7 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 176.5 mm | 167.2 mm |
| Width | 82.5 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Eco leather |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Gray, Orange, Green | Pantone Tapestry |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,612 px | 1,604 px |
| Pixel density | 267 ppi | 262 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 920 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 71.9% | 84.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G81 | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 402,175 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,074 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 384 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/2.2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 13,000 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 17.4 h |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -21 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Hello UI |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | F | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,100 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 65 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
