- android.gs
- Compare
- Fire 3 Pro vs Moto G Play (2026)
Doogee Fire 3 Pro vs Motorola Moto G Play (2026)
What Fire 3 Pro does better (5) and where Moto G Play (2026) wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.7Display6.2
3.7Camera3.8
7.8Battery7.7
7.3Features9.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Fire 3 ProMoto G Play (2026)
| Fire 3 Pro | Moto G Play (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.5 mm | 167.2 mm | −4.7 mm |
| Width | 77.4 mm | 76.4 mm | +1 mm |
| Thickness | 17.8 mm | 8.5 mm | +9.3 mm |
| Weight | 290 g | 202 g | +88 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Fire 3 Pro better than Moto G Play (2026)?
- Battery capacity8,350 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+61%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Pixel density293 ppi vs 262 ppi+12%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/2.2+22%
Why is Moto G Play (2026) better than Fire 3 Pro?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Main camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- Stereo speakersNo · Fire 3 Pro: Yes
- CPU frequency1.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+50%
- Weight290 g vs 202 g+44%
- Thickness17.8 mm vs 8.5 mm2.1×
- Screen size5.5″ vs 6.7″+22%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- eSIMNo · Fire 3 Pro: Yes
- Screen-to-body ratio62.1% vs 84.7%+36%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 290 g | 202 g |
| Thickness | 17.8 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 162.5 mm | 167.2 mm |
| Width | 77.4 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Eco leather |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Gray, Orange, Green | Pantone Tapestry |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 5.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,440 px | 1,604 px |
| Pixel density | 293 ppi | 262 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 920 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 62.1% | 84.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T7200 | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 402,175 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,074 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 384 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,350 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 17.4 h |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -21 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Hello UI |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,100 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 91 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | D | — |
