- android.gs
- Compare
- Blade20 Ultra vs Y200 4G
Doogee Blade20 Ultra vs Vivo Y200 4G
What Blade20 Ultra does better (5) and where Y200 4G wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.8Display8.4
4.6Camera5.9
7.9Battery7.4
7.3Features4.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Blade20 UltraY200 4G
| Blade20 Ultra | Y200 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 174 mm | 163.2 mm | +10.8 mm |
| Width | 81.2 mm | 75.9 mm | +5.3 mm |
| Thickness | 15.8 mm | 7.8 mm | +8 mm |
| Weight | 326 g | 188 g | +138 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Blade20 Ultra better than Y200 4G?
- Battery capacity10,300 mAh vs 5,000 mAh2.1×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- NFCYes · Y200 4G: No
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
Why is Y200 4G better than Blade20 Ultra?
- Wired charging18 W vs 80 W4.4×
- OLED panelNo · Blade20 Ultra: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Blade20 Ultra: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Weight326 g vs 188 g+73%
- CPU frequency1.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+56%
- Pixel density267 ppi vs 395 ppi+48%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- Thickness15.8 mm vs 7.8 mm2×
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio74.1% vs 86.7%+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 326 g | 188 g |
| Thickness | 15.8 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 174 mm | 163.2 mm |
| Width | 81.2 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Red, Silver | Titanium Silver, Emerald Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,612 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 267 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 74.1% | 86.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T7250 | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 448,509 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,524 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.5" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,300 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 80% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Funtouch 14 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | C | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,100 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 84 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
