android.gs
Compare
Blade20 Ultra vs Hot 60 Pro+

Doogee Blade20 Ultra vs Infinix Hot 60 Pro+

What Blade20 Ultra does better (5) and where Hot 60 Pro+ wins (14) — every spec side by side.

Doogee · 2025Blade20 Ultra

7.0Score

5 advantages≈ $250

Infinix · 2025Hot 60 Pro+

7.2Score

14 advantages

Higher score

4.8Display9.8

4.6Camera5.2

7.9Battery5.5

7.3Features5.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

Blade20 UltraHot 60 Pro+

	Blade20 Ultra	Hot 60 Pro+	Difference
Height	174 mm	164 mm	+10 mm
Width	81.2 mm	75.8 mm	+5.4 mm
Thickness	15.8 mm	6 mm	+9.8 mm
Weight	326 g	155 g	+171 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Blade20 Ultra better than Hot 60 Pro+?

Battery capacity10,300 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+100%
Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
Storage (base)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
Memory card slotYes · Hot 60 Pro+: No

Why is Hot 60 Pro+ better than Blade20 Ultra?

Wired charging18 W vs 45 W2.5×
Refresh rate90 Hz vs 144 Hz+60%
Weight326 g vs 155 g2.1×
OLED panelNo · Blade20 Ultra: Yes
Stereo speakersNo · Blade20 Ultra: Yes
Pixel density267 ppi vs 440 ppi+65%
Thickness15.8 mm vs 6 mm2.6×
CPU frequency1.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+22%
Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,224 px+70%
Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
Selfie camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Doogee Blade20 Ultra≈ $2507.0	Infinix Hot 60 Pro+7.2
Design
Weight	326 g	155 g
Thickness	15.8 mm	6 mm
Height	174 mm	164 mm
Width	81.2 mm	75.8 mm
Frame	—	Plastic
Back	—	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP68	IP65
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx5
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Colours	Red, Silver	Sleek Black, Titanium Silver, Coral Tides, Misty Violet, Sonic Yellow, Moco Cyber Green
Display
Screen size	6.6″	6.8″
Panel	IPS LCD	AMOLED
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	720 px	1,224 px
Resolution (height)	1,612 px	2,720 px
Pixel density	267 ppi	440 ppi
Refresh rate	90 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	—	4,500 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,650 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	74.1%	89.3%
Performance
Chipset	Unisoc T7250	Mediatek Helio G200
Chip maker	Unisoc	MediaTek
Process	12 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	1.8 GHz	2.2 GHz
GPU	Mali-G57 MP1	Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score	—	446,336
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	1,945
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	380
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	512 GB	128 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/2.5"	1/1.95"
Rear cameras	1	1
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Ultra-wide camera	No	No
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	1080p	1080p
Selfie camera	8 MP	13 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	10,300 mAh	5,160 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	11.2 h
Wired charging	18 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	—	68%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	—	No
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	No	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-25.1 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	XOS 15.1
Major OS updates promised	—	3
EU label
Energy class	C	—
Battery charge cycles	1,100	—
Endurance per cycle	84 h	—
Repairability class	C	—
Drop resistance class	A	—