- android.gs
- Compare
- Blade10 Ultra vs Spark 20 Pro+
Doogee Blade10 Ultra vs Tecno Spark 20 Pro+
What Blade10 Ultra does better (3) and where Spark 20 Pro+ wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.8Display8.0
5.1Camera6.6
7.6Battery4.2
6.0Features4.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Blade10 UltraSpark 20 Pro+
| Blade10 Ultra | Spark 20 Pro+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 172.7 mm | 164.7 mm | +8 mm |
| Width | 80 mm | 75 mm | +5 mm |
| Thickness | 11 mm | 7.6 mm | +3.4 mm |
| Weight | 240 g | 179 g | +61 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Blade10 Ultra better than Spark 20 Pro+?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx32.7×
- Battery capacity5,150 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+3%
- Memory card slotYes · Spark 20 Pro+: No
Why is Spark 20 Pro+ better than Blade10 Ultra?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Peak brightness400 nits vs 1,000 nits2.5×
- OLED panelNo · Blade10 Ultra: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Blade10 Ultra: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Pixel density269 ppi vs 393 ppi+46%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- CPU frequency1.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+38%
- Weight240 g vs 179 g+34%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 240 g | 179 g |
| Thickness | 11 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 172.7 mm | 164.7 mm |
| Width | 80 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black | Temporal Orbits, Lunar Frost, Radiant Starstream, Magic Skin 2.0 Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,612 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 549 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 62.6% | 89% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 386,262 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,787 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 347 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,150 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.9 h |
| Wired charging | — | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 54% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.2 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 14 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 51 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
